My objective in this text is to present a counterpoint to the positivist bias that has dominated the debate on open science and eventually highlight some problems and provide a more plural and inclusive perspective on the subject. I reflect on three key points that have pervaded the debate on open science, namely: (a) open access to the knowledge produced, (b) transparency in research processes, and (c) replication and reproducibility of previous research. My focus is on highlighting the need for a plural and inclusive view of science, one which is grounded on otherness assumptions.
Real Time Impact Factor:
Pending
Author Name: Marcelo de Souza Bispo
URL: View PDF
Keywords: open science, otherness, epistemology, open data, transparency in research
ISSN:
EISSN: 1982-7849
EOI/DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/1982-7
Add Citation
Views: 1
