The article analyzes human rights discourses in debates regarding abortion
and human embryonic stem cell research as a part of the process of biosociality.
These questions arise in the health and reproductive field and move into
the realm of the law because of ethical issues. The text examines discourses
regarding the transformation of embryos and fetuses into subjects of rights
in the context of the Supreme Court: the legal move for unconstitutionality
against Biossecurity Law that authorized stem cell extraction from supernumerary
embryos created through assisted reproduction (ADI 3510), and the
legal case that proposes to include in legal abortion anticipated parturition of
anencephalous fetuses (ADPF 54).
Real Time Impact Factor:
Pending
Author Name: Naara Luna
URL: View PDF
Keywords: human rights, biosociality, abortion of anencephalous, human embryonic stem cells, ADI 3510, ADPF 54.
ISSN: 1809-4341
EISSN:
EOI/DOI: DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1590
Add Citation
Views: 1421
