In “Hume and Julius Caesar,” G.E.M. Anscombe argues that some historical claims, such as “Julius Caesar was assassinated,” serve as touchstones for historical knowledge. Only Cartesian doubt can call them into question. I examine her reasons for thinking that the discipline of history must be grounded in claims that it is powerless to discredit. I argue that she is right to recognize that some historical claims are harder to dislodge than others, but wrong to contend that any are invulnerable to non-Cartesian doubt.
Real Time Impact Factor:
Pending
Author Name: Catherine Z. Elgin
URL: View PDF
Keywords: history, historiography, Anscombe, epistemology
ISSN: 2069-0533
EISSN: 2069-3052
EOI/DOI: 10.5840/logos-episteme20101120
Add Citation
Views: 1
