Many studies bubble into being to tackle a syntactic term in light of origin, development, history, documentation and criticism. Such studies have been endeavouring to generalize it for not being in confusion or causing controversy; they fluctuate between consensus and chasm. Those who coin the term never pay much heed to the utterance “term”; sometimes we do find Basrah term stirring controversy in Basrah, or a Kufian one the Kufians themselves never regard as common. As a result, the past sources use such a term, and other sources come in line with; that is why it is open to misconstruction. In time, it is necessary for a term to be in common consensus (limitation: definition) and in logics. Such is not noted in the terms we have nowadays. Consequently, the current study endeavours, through the three parts, to show the reader the specialized –Arabic language, the studied-Arabic language and the researchers the most salient controversies in the syntactic term in light of our modest accumulative experience in tackling Arabic and continuous edification extending forty odd years.
Real Time Impact Factor:
Pending
Author Name: Dr. Osama Rashid Al-Safar Ibin Rushd
URL: View PDF
Keywords: Syntactic Term in Controversy
ISSN: 2227-0345
EISSN: 2311-9152
EOI/DOI:
Add Citation
Views: 1
