Many species that occur at low densities are not accurately estimated using capture–recapture methods as such techniques assume that populations are well–defined in space. To solve this bias, spatially explicit capture–recapture (SECR) models have recently been developed. These models incorporate movement and can identify areas where it is more likely for individuals to concentrate their activity. In this study, we used data from camera–trap surveys of common genets (Genetta genetta) in Serra da Malcata (Portugal), designed to compare abundance estimates produced by SECR models with traditional closed–capture models. Using the SECR models, we observed spatial heterogeneity in genet distribution and density estimates were approximately two times lower than those obtained from the closed population models. The non–spatial model estimates were constrained to sampling grid size and likely underestimated movements, thereby overestimating density. Future research should consider the incorporation of cost–weighed models that can include explicit hypothesis on how environmental variables influence the distance metric.
Real Time Impact Factor:
Pending
Author Name: P. Sarmento, J. Cruz, C. Eira & C. Fonseca
URL: View PDF
Keywords: Camera–trapping, Capture–recapture, Genet, Program MARK, SECR package, Spatial models
ISSN: 1578-665X
EISSN: 2014-928X
EOI/DOI:
Add Citation
Views: 4970
